The Global Warming Hoax

HERE THEY GO AGAIN!

2011-11-21T12:34:00.000-08:00

HERE THEY GO AGAIN!

Notice they always quote percentage increases or PPM [parts per million] and never the total % of the atmosphere. The Number One Green House Gas in the Atmosphere? WATER VAPOR!

FACT: Carbon dioxide (chemical formula CO2) is a naturally occurring chemical compound composed of two oxygen atoms covalently bonded to a single carbon atom. It is a gas at standard temperature and pressure and exists in Earth's atmosphere in this state, as a trace gas at a concentration of 0.039% by volume.

0.039% BY VOLUME! THAT MEANS THAT 99.961% IS NOT CARBON!

FACT: Dry air contains roughly (by volume) 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases.

Here are three very different recent articles on Global Warming. It is very easy to desern the spin from the left;

1.) UN: Global concentrations of carbon dioxide at record level, exceed worst-case projections

2.) Global warming we can all cheer

3.) Global Warming Can Be Eased Only With Zero Emissions

Scientific Audit of U.N. Climate Panel Concludes Alarmist Claims Lack Evidence By Kevin Moone

2010-10-13T14:43:00.000-07:00

From GetLiberty.org
http://blog.getliberty.org/default.asp?Display=2714

The Cooler Heads Digest by the Competitive Enterprise Institute

2010-10-03T06:20:00.000-07:00

The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) provides the Cooler Heads Digest as a weekly Newsletter which collects the best articles/columns discussing Global Warming - Climate Change or whatever they are calling it this week. I have found the newsletter to be very helpful and interesting. "The Cooler Heads Digest" sign up.

Besides the "Cooler Heads Digest" CEI has a widespread presents on the Web, including Twitter, Facebook and Youtube.

Here are Links to more of what CEI has available;

Global Warming [Climate Change] Skeptics!

2010-10-01T09:16:00.000-07:00

Science is all about skepticism. Science tests theories with experiments and gathering empirical data. Man made Global Warming is a THEORY! To attempt to silence skeptics is anti-science.

Dennis Miller on Global Warming - Genius!

2010-06-06T05:37:00.001-07:00

Should We Burn "An Inconvenient Truth" for heat?

2010-01-22T12:05:00.000-08:00

Should We Burn "An Inconvenient Truth" for heat?

In the face of a brutal cold snap and fuel shortages in Britain, it's been reported that pensioners are actually buying used books to burn for heating fuel. That's why Freedom Action this week issued a video plea to Mr. Gore to join an effort to collect and airlift copies of his global warming science fiction bestsellers to help these people in dire need.

Thanks to Cooler Head Digest and Freedom Action for this, it made my day.

IPCC: “Our bad! Global warming not about to melt Himalayas. by Michael Fumento

2010-01-22T09:29:00.000-08:00

The Global Warming Crowd should be in full retreat after what has come out in the last 3 months or so but alas they are true believers. It really takes a huge leap of faith to believe in Global Warming [Climate Change];

Global Warming is caused by carbon in the atmosphere.
Global Warming is caused by man
Global Warming will result in a worldwide catastrophe.

I think people are beginning to see the light and the following article should be another nail in the Global Warming coffin.

Read Article Here

Climategate: From Skepticism to Investigation » The Foundry

2009-12-03T11:42:00.000-08:00

Climategate: From Skepticism to Investigation » The Foundry

12 Days of ClimateGate and Network News Programs Are Still Ignoring the Scandal

2009-12-03T10:16:00.000-08:00

Is anyone surprised that ABC, CBS and NBC all have ignored ClimateGate? I'm not because these "News" organizations are farther left that the R.O.P. squad (Reid, Obama, Pelosi). Read this article by Julia A Seymour on News Busters (great site by the way).

12 Days of ClimateGate and Network News Programs Are Still Ignoring the Scandal

Inconvenient Truth - A Cartoon

2009-12-01T07:26:00.001-08:00

The Global Warming Debate

2009-11-30T08:50:00.000-08:00

The Last Word

"As Air Force One heads to Copenhagen for the climate summit Dec. 9, it will presumably not make a U-turn while flying over the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at University of East Anglia near Norwich, England. But perhaps it should. The 61 megabytes of CRU e-mails and documents made public by a hacker cast serious doubt on the ballyhooed consensus on manmade global warming that the Copenhagen summit was called to address. The CRU has been a major source of data on global temperatures, relied on by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. But the e-mails suggest that CRU scientists have been suppressing and misstating data and working to prevent the publication of conflicting views in peer-reviewed science periodicals. ... For those of us who have long suspected that constructing scientific models of climate and weather is an enormously complex undertaking quite possibly beyond the capacity of current computer technology, the CRU e-mails are not so surprising. Do we really suppose that anyone can construct a database of weather observations for the entire planet and its atmosphere adequate to make confident predictions of weather and climate 60 years from now? Predictions in which we have enough confidence to impose enormous costs on the American and world economies? ... The more interesting question going forward is whether European and American governmental, academic and corporate elites, having embraced global warming alarmism with religious fervor, will be shaken by the scandalous CRU e-mails. They should be." --political analyst Michael Barone

(To submit reader comments click here.)

Fewer Americans believe in global warming, poll shows - washingtonpost.com

2009-11-25T08:13:00.000-08:00

The worm is turning. It has been well on it's way in Britain and is now gaining steam here in the States.

Fewer Americans believe in global warming, poll shows - washingtonpost.com

Himalayan Glaciers Not Impacted by Global Warming

2009-11-13T12:56:00.000-08:00

India ’s environment ministry on Monday published a discussion paper stating that there was no conclusive evidence to prove that the Himalayan glaciers are melting due to climate change. The author of the report, Dr. V K Raina told the Times of India that “None of our glaciers under monitoring are recording abnormal retreat.”

[per Cooler Heads Digest]

“Deconstructing Global Warming” Presentation by Dr. Richard S. Lindzen by William Yeatman

2009-10-30T14:00:00.000-07:00

The Cooler Heads Coalition hosted Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Video of Dr. Lindzen’s presentation, “Deconstructing Global Warming,” will be available shortly, but his power point presentation.

lindzen-talk-pdf.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Lord Monkton debunks Global Warming

2009-10-21T08:48:00.000-07:00

This is really great when he is putting forth the science against global warming, but really crazy when asserting a new world order.

Glenn Beck: Global Warming greatest scam in history

2009-10-21T06:54:00.001-07:00

Online Resources

2009-09-25T12:06:00.000-07:00

Online Resources;

1. Global Warming Hoax: News
2. GlobalWarming.org | Climate Change News & Analysis
3. Climate Depot
4. CO2 Science
5. Think for Yourself!
6. CFACT: Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow
7. E-Team: A National Center for Policy Analysis Project
8. Capital Research Center
9. Cornwall Alliance
10. JunkScience.com

No particular order of importance. All have valuable articles to add to the debate. I will update from time to time as I find more. Feel free to post sites you have found to have value.

Is There Global Warming?

2009-08-11T14:15:00.000-07:00

(the answer may not be what you expected)

Found a very interesting and informative web site. http://www.isthereglobalwarming.com/

Check it out.

Climate Change Facts

2009-07-16T10:42:00.000-07:00

1. The "Greenhouse Effect" is a natural and valuable phenomenon, without which, the planet would be uninhabitable.

2. Modest Global Warming, at least up until 1998 when a cooling trend began, has been real.

3. CO2 is not a significant greenhouse gas; 95% of the contribution is due to Water Vapor.

4. Man's contribution to Greenhouse Gasses is relatively insignificant. We didn't cause the recent Global Warming and we cannot stop it.

5. Solar Activity appears to be the principal driver for Climate Change, accompanied by complex ocean currents which distribute the heat and control local weather systems.

6. CO2 is a useful trace gas in the atmosphere, and the planet would actually benefit by having more, not less of it, because it is not a driver for Global Warming and would enrich our vegetation, yielding better crops to feed the expanding population.

7. CO2 is not causing global warming, in fact, CO2 is lagging temperature change in all reliable datasets. The cart is not pulling the donkey, and the future cannot influence the past.

8. Nothing happening in the climate today is particularly unusual, and in fact has happened many times in the past and will likely happen again in the future.

9. The UN IPCC has corrupted the "reporting process" so badly, it makes the oil-for-food scandal look like someone stole some kid's lunch money. They do not follow the Scientific Method, and modify the science as needed to fit their predetermined conclusions. In empirical science, one does NOT write the conclusion first, then solicit "opinion" on the report, ignoring any opinion which does not fit their predetermined conclusion while falsifying data to support unrealistic models.

10. Polar Bear populations are not endangered, in fact current populations are healthy and at almost historic highs. The push to list them as endangered is an effort to gain political control of their habitat... particularly the North Slope oil fields.

11. There is no demonstrated causal relationship between hurricanes and/or tornadoes and global warming. This is sheer conjecture totally unsupported by any material science.

12. Observed glacial retreats in certain select areas have been going on for hundreds of years, and show no serious correlation to short-term swings in global temperatures.

13. Greenland is shown to be an island completely surrounded by water, not ice, in maps dating to the 14th century. There is active geothermal activity in the currently "melting" sections of Greenland.

14. The Antarctic Ice cover is currently the largest ever observed by satellite, and periodic ice shelf breakups are normal and correlate well with localized tectonic and geothermal activity along the Antarctic Peninsula.

15. The Global Warming Panic was triggered by an artifact of poor mathematics which has been thoroughly disproved. The panic is being deliberately nurtured by those who stand to gain both financially and politically from perpetuation of the hoax.

16. Scientists who "deny" the hoax are often threatened with loss of funding or even their jobs.

17. The correlation between solar activity and climate is now so strong that solar physicists are now seriously discussing the much greater danger of pending global cooling.

18. Biofuel hysteria is already having a disastrous effect on world food supplies and prices, and current technologies for biofuel production consume more energy than the fuels produce.

19. Global Warming Hysteria is potentially linked to a stress-induced mental disorder.

20. In short, there is no "climate crisis" of any kind at work on our planet.

The article I found these facts in is really technical but here it is anyway; Editorial: The Great Global Warming Hoax?

The Global Warming Hoax

2009-07-16T10:41:00.000-07:00

I am posting the complete article from the Investor's Business Daily below because I believe that it is very important for all to read. To radically transform our economy and way of life to effect the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere when 2% of the atmosphere is made up of all greenhouse gases and 3.6% of Greenhouse gases are CO2 and only 3.4% of the CO2 comes from human activity is unbelievable and irresponsible.[We're talking about 0.0024% of the atmosphere] Talk about an inconvenient truth.

Carbongate

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 4:20 PM PT

Climate Change: A suppressed EPA study says old U.N. data ignore the decline in global temperatures and other inconvenient truths. Was the report kept under wraps to influence the vote on the cap-and-trade bill?

This was supposed to be the most transparent administration ever. Yet as the House of Representatives prepared to vote on the Waxman-Markey bill, the largest tax increase in U.S. history on 100% of Americans, an attempt was made to suppress a study shredding supporters' arguments.

On Friday, the day of the vote, the Competitive Enterprise Institute said it was releasing "an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency."

In the release, the institute's Richard Morrison said "internal EPA e-mail messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the administration's agenda of regulating carbon dioxide."

Reading the report, available on the CEI Web site, we find this "endangerment analysis" contains such interesting items as: "Given the downward trend in temperatures since 1998 (which some think will continue until at least 2030), there is no particular reason to rush into decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."

What the report says is that the EPA, by adopting the United Nations' 2007 "Fourth Assessment" report, is relying on outdated research by its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The research, it says, is "at best three years out of date in a rapidly changing field" and ignores the latest scientific findings.

Besides noting the decline in temperatures as CO2 levels have increased, the draft report says the "consensus" on storm frequency and intensity is now "much more neutral."

Then there's one of Al Gore's grim fairy tales — the melting of the Greenland ice sheet and glaciers the size of Tennessee roaming the North Atlantic. "The idea that warming temperatures will cause Greenland to rapidly shed its ice has been greatly diminished by new results indicating little evidence for operations of such processes," the report says.

Little evidence? Outdated U.N. research? No reason to rush? This is not what the Obama administration and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were telling us when they were rushing to force a Friday vote on Waxman-Markey. We were given the impression that unless we passed this cap-and-tax fiasco, polar bears would be extinct by the Fourth of July.

We have noted frequently the significance of solar activity on earth's climate and history. This EPA draft report not only confirms our reporting but the brazen incompetence of those "experts" that have been prophesying planetary apocalypse.

"A new 2009 paper by Scafetta and West," the report says, "suggests that the IPCC used faulty solar data in dismissing the direct effect of solar variability on global temperatures. Their report suggests that solar variability could account for up to 68% of the increase in Earth's global temperatures."

The report was the product of Alan Carlin, senior operations research analyst at the EPA's National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE). He's been with the EPA for 38 years but now has been taken off all climate-related work. He is convinced that actual climate observations do not match climate change theories and that only the politics, not the science, has been settled.

Thomas Fuller, environmental policy blogger with the San Francisco Examiner, wrote Thursday in a story developed in conjunction with Anthony Watts' Web site wattsupwiththat.com: "A source inside the Environmental Protection Agency confirmed many of the claims made by analyst Alan Carlin, the economist/physicist who yesterday went public with accusations that science was being ignored in evaluating the danger of CO2."

All this is particularly interesting because of the charges by Al Gore, NASA's James Hansen and others that the Bush administration and energy companies actively suppressed the truth about climate change.

One of the e-mails unearthed by CEI was dated March 12, from Al McGartland, office director at NCEE, forbidding Carlin from speaking to anyone outside NCEE on endangerment issues such as those in his suppressed report.

Carlin replied on March 16, requesting that his study be forwarded to EPA's Office of Air and Radiation, which directs EPA's climate change program. Carlin points out the peer-reviewed references in his study and points out that the new studies "explain much of the observational data that have been collected which cannot be explained by the IPCC models."

For saying the climate change emperors had no clothes, Carlin was told March 17: "The administrator and the administration have decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision. . . . I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office."

In other words, the administration and Congress had their collective minds made up and didn't want to be confused with the facts. They certainly didn't want any inconvenient truths coming out of their own Environmental Protection Agency, the one that wants to regulate everything from your lawn mower to bovine emissions and which says the product of your respiration and ours, carbon dioxide, is a dangerous pollutant and not the basis for all life on earth.

The problem the warm-mongers have is they now are in a position of telling the American people, who are you going to believe — us or your own lying eyes? Forget the snow in Malibu, the record cold winters. Forget that temperatures have dropped for a decade.

In April, President Obama declared that "the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over." Apparently not, for as he spoke those very words his administration was suppressing science to advance a very pernicious ideology.

I am posting the complete article from the Investor's Business Daily below because I believe that it is very important for all to read. To radically transform our economy and way of life to effect the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere when 2% of the atmosphere is made up of all greenhouse gases and 3.6% of Greenhouse gases areCO2 and only 3.4% of the CO2 comes from human activity is unbelievable and irresponsible.[We're talking about 0.0024% of the atmosphere] Talk about an inconvenienttruth.
Carbongate

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 4:20 PM PT

Climate Change: A suppressed EPA study says old U.N. data ignore the decline in global temperatures and other inconvenient truths. Was the report kept under wraps to influence the vote on the cap-and-trade bill?

This was supposed to be the most transparent administration ever. Yet as the House of Representatives prepared to vote on the Waxman-Markey bill, the largest tax increase in U.S. history on 100% of Americans, an attempt was made to suppress a study shredding supporters' arguments.

On Friday, the day of the vote, the Competitive Enterprise Institute said it was releasing "an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency."

In the release, the institute's Richard Morrison said "internal EPA e-mail messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the administration's agenda of regulating carbon dioxide."

Reading the report, available on the CEI Web site, we find this "endangerment analysis" contains such interesting items as: "Given the downward trend in temperatures since 1998 (which some think will continue until at least 2030), there is no particular reason to rush into decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."

What the report says is that the EPA, by adopting the United Nations' 2007 "Fourth Assessment" report, is relying on outdated research by its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The research, it says, is "at best three years out of date in a rapidly changing field" and ignores the latest scientific findings.

Besides noting the decline in temperatures as CO2 levels have increased, the draft report says the "consensus" on storm frequency and intensity is now "much more neutral."

Then there's one of Al Gore's grim fairy tales — the melting of the Greenland ice sheet and glaciers the size of Tennessee roaming the North Atlantic. "The idea that warming temperatures will cause Greenland to rapidly shed its ice has been greatly diminished by new results indicating little evidence for operations of such processes," the report says.

Little evidence? Outdated U.N. research? No reason to rush? This is not what the Obama administration and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were telling us when they were rushing to force a Friday vote on Waxman-Markey. We were given the impression that unless we passed this cap-and-tax fiasco, polar bears would be extinct by the Fourth of July.

We have noted frequently the significance of solar activity on earth's climate and history. This EPA draft report not only confirms our reporting but the brazen incompetence of those "experts" that have been prophesying planetary apocalypse.

"A new 2009 paper by Scafetta and West," the report says, "suggests that the IPCC used faulty solar data in dismissing the direct effect of solar variability on global temperatures. Their report suggests that solar variability could account for up to 68% of the increase in Earth's global temperatures."

The report was the product of Alan Carlin, senior operations research analyst at the EPA's National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE). He's been with the EPA for 38 years but now has been taken off all climate-related work. He is convinced that actual climate observations do not match climate change theories and that only the politics, not the science, has been settled.

Thomas Fuller, environmental policy blogger with the San Francisco Examiner, wrote Thursday in a story developed in conjunction with Anthony Watts' Web site wattsupwiththat.com: "A source inside the Environmental Protection Agency confirmed many of the claims made by analyst Alan Carlin, the economist/physicist who yesterday went public with accusations that science was being ignored in evaluating the danger of CO2."

All this is particularly interesting because of the charges by Al Gore, NASA's James Hansen and others that the Bush administration and energy companies actively suppressed the truth about climate change.

One of the e-mails unearthed by CEI was dated March 12, from Al McGartland, office director at NCEE, forbidding Carlin from speaking to anyone outside NCEE on endangerment issues such as those in his suppressed report.

Carlin replied on March 16, requesting that his study be forwarded to EPA's Office of Air and Radiation, which directs EPA's climate change program. Carlin points out the peer-reviewed references in his study and points out that the new studies "explain much of the observational data that have been collected which cannot be explained by the IPCC models."

For saying the climate change emperors had no clothes, Carlin was told March 17: "The administrator and the administration have decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision. . . . I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office."

In other words, the administration and Congress had their collective minds made up and didn't want to be confused with the facts. They certainly didn't want any inconvenient truths coming out of their own Environmental Protection Agency, the one that wants to regulate everything from your lawn mower to bovine emissions and which says the product of your respiration and ours, carbon dioxide, is a dangerous pollutant and not the basis for all life on earth.

The problem the warm-mongers have is they now are in a position of telling the American people, who are you going to believe — us or your own lying eyes? Forget the snow in Malibu, the record cold winters. Forget that temperatures have dropped for a decade.

In April, President Obama declared that "the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over." Apparently not, for as he spoke those very words his administration was suppressing science to advance a very pernicious ideology.